There are reasons women were prohibited from 'sowing wild oats'...
I am writing something at the moment abt the potential problem of mass immigration to British secular, liberal democracy but values vary.
-
-
That's true, but the British character is irrevocably changed regardless. Educated women less likely to have children. Can't be good.
-
Not ideal but I don't see a solution unless it were for men to take on half of the childcare & flexible, reduced hours etc.
-
That might make women with intellectual passions & ambition more willing to have more children. If it didn't have to prevent them doing that
-
Yes, but you are assuming men want that. Two way street. Both 'independent' now.
-
No, I'm not. I'm floating hypotheticals. Men or women who want to stabilise the population could sacrifice their career goals.
-
But I think in reality, most won't. They'll pursue their own goals anyway. But sometimes think it's only women who shld sacrifice goals.
-
Assuming women's goals line up with men's. Women have more options in the mating game. Not about sacrifice but reality
-
Yes, you've said you don't want to discuss whether anything can or should be done abt it, just point out the issue so not much more to say.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.