Not sure why some people think 'the definition of marriage will change' is a convincing argument against opening it up to same-sex couples.
-
-
Thanks for letting me interject; I enjoy following you
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I guess but since hetero/homo can both marry legally, the courts are reluctant to get involved with marital assets of 5 adults
-
So, there's another barrier to the slippery slope?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wish I could find the article from UK where a Muslim man received £36000 per month for 4 wives and 10? Children
-
I'll take your word for it in the meantime but I think this is a different, practical issue to the issue of whether polygamy is ethical.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the concern about polymarriage is cost of spousal benefits, halve them for two spouses, split three ways for three spouses, etc.
-
Guess what: because every adult gets benefits, it would even out.
-
If everyone was honest Otherwise they can easily scam the benefits system
-
That's always the case tho. The dishonesty is the problem rather than the marriage.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If they were caught for fraud. As it is now it is illegal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An accredited college or traing program for a length of time. But considered single Mothers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In Utah some cults claim all children as dependants plus wife #1, other 'spiritual wives receive welfare, SNAP etc but must be enrolled in
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.