Not sure why some people think 'the definition of marriage will change' is a convincing argument against opening it up to same-sex couples.
-
-
I doubt many ppl are genuinely concerned abt the meanings of words expanding so better to make an ethical argument abt actual issue.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The observation is coupled with slippery-slope arg. i.e. if we expand marriage to include SSM, what prevents it from including polygamy?
-
Butting in here Polygamy means some wives are on welfare for a time. Islam is demanding it in Europe for 4 wives and x children
-
Huh? Why? Must go both ways.
-
You mean marriage include every variety?
-
No, I mean polygamy works both ways. Islam authorises polygyny
-
Thanks for letting me interject; I enjoy following you
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.