That's an observation, not an argument. Once, 'voter' referred to property-owning men. Now it refers to all adults. Observation.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I doubt many ppl are genuinely concerned abt the meanings of words expanding so better to make an ethical argument abt actual issue.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It never changed? So blacks can't marry whites, Protestants can't marry Catholics, and divorce is still illegal?
-
No-one claimed it never changed. Even the OP said it had evolved.
-
But allowing people like me to affirm their love by way of a marriage is a bridge too far, of course.
-
(I'm going to sign off; it's late, and I'm tired, and it's making me grumpy)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Irrelevant. We have a contract. All citizens deserve equal protection under the law. But you already know this. Not sure why it's so hard for some to understand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or they honestly think the goats thing because no one ever taught them that "slippery slope" thing is a fallacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, the argument that changing the definition of marriage would inconvenience the writers of dictionaries was not the strongest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are bigots but don't want to admit or be called that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They must be so profoundly conservative they think it's self-evident that changing the definition of an important institution is bad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.