Isn't there a motte & bailey element to this? "Oh of course not *all*, are you an idiot?" <goes back to castigating all x group immediately>
-
-
-
That's it - people insist they don't believe in [extremely wide statement] but they certainly act as if they do
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Accepted givens. Men are better than women. Homosexuality is wrong. Black people are lower than whites.Historical given until argued against
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because you are being satisfied with a lame
#NotAll argument rather than demanding a stronger one of yourself. Accepting group differences. -
The alt right accepts group differences. Which is why they're wrong. Yes, ALL of them.
-
And here I'm supposed to call you out on ignorance of science. Will it matter if I don't? Should we restrain you?
-
Word salad. What's your point?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.