I'm neither a scientist nor a statistician but I speak on political matters all the time & cite statistics. It's not hard.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure is. It's applying a numerical literacy test to political speech. It's undemocratic. "You may speak but only as I specifically direct."
-
Pointing out someone's error isn't denying them free speech,nor is it undemocratic. Free speech & democracy depend on being able to do this.
-
She said “before.” Prior restraint.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There tends to be a confusion of arrogance and self important declarations with competence and evidence with some opposed to "elitism"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
surely rectally derived 'facts', are as valid as actual facts. Elitist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facts, evidence, science, reality--all now "elitist" concepts. Are we 2 strive 4 bigotry, hatred, ignorance, thuggishness 2 be "democratic"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The increasingly common event of the ignorant don't like being picked up on their ignorance. Therefore your elitists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.