This is cobblers. The author misunderstands the term; it's about her annoyance with individual self-described intersectional feminists.
-
-
Do you not think it's vaguely ironic that you're arguing for diversity of individual opinion while lumping all intersectionals together?
-
No. The problem with an intersectional feminist framework is that it discourages this. There are consequences for stepping out of it.
-
Not my experience at all, but I suppose we'll just have to differ.
-
I suppose so.Your experience might be different if you were a black conservative, a trans universal liberal or an ex-Muslim critics of Islam
-
Ah, so are you saying my specific identity defines my experience and there's no room for my individual opinion?
-
I'm saying an objective reality exists and that your experience might not indicate that there is no problem with intersectional feminism.
-
A movement/ideology/religion is best judged by how it deals with people who disagree with it rather than people who agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If it were possible to have universal liberal views on diversity & inclusion w/out facing firing (See Damore, Weinstein, Christakis)
-
or public vilification, there'd be no problem. They'd just be fringe extremists that no-one took seriously. They are taken seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.