Hm. I thought you did talk about the lack of (large sample) studies and the need for more.
-
-
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1
Not in relation to dysphoria. Will do if I write about it again. Very contentious. Much disagreement by 'objective' people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I must have read this wrong. I assumed it to be about transgender research in general. Because there really should be more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1
Yes, I was speaking generally and in relation to looking for biological evidence of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
So their critique is that part should have been more clear?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1
It's that it feeds into 'the desistance myth' which misrepresents a lot of things to claim, essentially, that it's a fad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
Given the existence of that, it would have been better to give more info specifically with it in mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Had to look that up. Yes. This would have been good to touch on. Can you add on? Or follow up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1
I'll ask Malhar about a post-edit if any more people see this bit as feeding into that. At the moment, it's two. Most people get it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
As did I. I still think it's an honest, great and respectful piece.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.