Hm. I would look at this differently, I think. for example: Atheism. Radical position is to make it acceptable. To do so you efficiently,
Yes, but a radical lefty is a different thing to a centrist. A centrist would be genuinely committed to a middle position.
-
-
helps me to think of centrist as a political position on a spectrum, moderate is an attitude one, not necessarily on center.
-
Maybe that's it.
My idea would be to take the moderate road. Not necessarily the centrist position. -
a moderate conservative or moderate euro socialist is not, in most countries, a centrist. even more so to moderate political islam.
-
No. My point was that you'd still have a radical (end)position. So you actually aren't centrist at all. You just take a moderate approach
-
In order to get closer to your radical goal. But in doing so, you might appear to be or would have to accept a centrist position short term.
-
a moderate socialist that wants socialism by incrementalism is not a centrist. spectrum looks shorter where there are only 2 parties uk/us
-
but where there are 5 or 10, the political center is clearly diff than moderate socialist or moderate conservative.
-
Yes. I know. I'm not saying they are. I'm saying on that issue that is the strategy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well, the game would be to be genuinely committed to that position for a start. But yes, of course. They are different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.