Or do more of them, who are western, mean that they work within the game because it's the game they value - secular, liberal democracy
So you'd start out by opposing those who said 'kill atheists' & those who said 'legalise atheism' & go with 'imprison atheists,'
-
-
I'd put it as: Take death-penalty of the table. Next step. Take jail-sentences of the table. Your goal is to stop atheists from being killed
-
But to be a centrist, you'd also have to oppose the other extreme - make atheism legal. Or you'd still be a radical but with modest goals.
-
Hm. Yes. I see your point. Don't need to oppose it, necessarily. Just suggest a more likely scenario in which you will succes more likely
-
I think you would have to. No-one believes ppl here is they claim to be a centrist but only oppose the left or right. They're right or left.
-
Hm...thinking about this one. Can you not be more radical left and accept smaller/moderate steps for the greater good?
-
Yes, but a radical lefty is a different thing to a centrist. A centrist would be genuinely committed to a middle position.
-
helps me to think of centrist as a political position on a spectrum, moderate is an attitude one, not necessarily on center.
-
Maybe that's it.
My idea would be to take the moderate road. Not necessarily the centrist position. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.