Late medieval religious writing officially. I spend more time arguing for secularism, liberalism, gender equality, respect for science etc
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
And the things you argue amount mostly involve human relationships and sociological development, which are "women stuff". And lit, obviously
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonaIbrahim @HPluckrose
Maybe I'm confusing context. I think I assumed your debates concerned the roles of those ideologies in the greater social context.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonaIbrahim
Yes, but that's the whole 'New Atheist' thing which has now passed & spread out into criticising other irrational ideologies.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
We're sitting here parceling out traditional female versus male roles. Kind of the issue presented in your original question.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonaIbrahim @HPluckrose
Assuming these roles are "fixed" is where we run into conflict.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonaIbrahim
Absolutely. I don't think there should be roles & that we should focus on individuality & supporting those who are gender non-conforming.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MonaIbrahim
I hope it's clear I am not disagreeing with you or pushing any particular position? I am interested in perspectives. U know better abt tech
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Of course. If you want constrictive debate it needs to be cooperative, not competitive. At least in my field (I work in transactions)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MonaIbrahim @HPluckrose
This is
% cooperative and constructive. 
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh good! I'm aware I can sometimes be a little intense & this is sometimes read as combative.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.