Serious question, tweeps. I'm open to the possibility that men thinking women intellectually inferior not uncommon. Why don't *I* see it?https://twitter.com/nevynxxx/status/912625196204478464 …
Yes, but that's the whole 'New Atheist' thing which has now passed & spread out into criticising other irrational ideologies.
-
-
And this has been widely misunderstood as a male thing tho I agree that it is largely ethical & involving verbal reasoning which are not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We're sitting here parceling out traditional female versus male roles. Kind of the issue presented in your original question.
-
Well, perceptions of them. I'm interested that your first instinct was to see the kind of arguing I do as something society deems womanish.
-
When received wisdom is the opposite but I am inclined to agree that verbal reasoning is something which attracts women at least as much.
-
As verbal reasoning is my particular talent I'm inclined to agree.

-
Women do have greater advantages here on average. Did you see this?http://www.futurity.org/verbally-acute-women-avoid-stem-careers/ …
-
The nature versus nurture argument is pretty pronounced in the general debate. Is it genetic predisposition or conditioning?
-
Language differences? They're pretty clearly innate. Much neuroscience on this & also observable in related dyslexia & autism differences.
-
As well as pancultural differences in the age when children start speaking & how they develop & communication priorities in other apes.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.