Variance theories are fairly sound, but it's two tailed also. Men get the majority of Nobel prizes, but also fill the majority of prisons.
I'm not sure this works in practice tho where to be much smarter than most people, you don't need to be a genius.https://twitter.com/scareduck/status/912665081275731969 …
-
-
-
Yes, I don't doubt them but I do doubt that mansplaining can be explained by them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And the stupidest men are much stupider? Explains politicians . . .
-
Yes, that, too. The tails are longer on BOTH ends (again, more variance).
-
Makes me feel all cozy-like.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It could come into play if your coterie is smart enough that you consider smarter-than-average to be unintelligent.
-
(By way of ex., I don't think Sarah Palin is actually unintelligent. I think she's average-intelligent at a level where that doesn't fly.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You are correct! On the other hand, this informs the size and nature of the sex split at that tail. Will still skew male.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.