So are the people ranting at me in defence of having children, btw. I assume they want them to survive.
-
-
TBH, I want out of this conversation. I had no intention of bringing a rant your way. Keep up the good work, Helen. Love ur writing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry, didn't realise you were still here!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
His somewhat toothed response to your 'we kind of are' comment was probably off putting, but I can't tell you how much I recommend watching
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PerspicAtheist @HPluckrose and
His two online lecture series and his book Maps of Meaning. In redibly enlightening (and no I'm not some religious convert now :P ).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PerspicAtheist @HPluckrose and
Atheists in particular need to know what Peterson (and for example John Vervaeke) have to say.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PerspicAtheist
I know what he has to say. I find it a problem in the same way I find postmodernism a problem. Undermines objective truth & reason.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @PerspicAtheist
In fact I find it a particularly big problem & have said so a lot.pic.twitter.com/3erwERSKek
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
He's a scientist with a long list of highly cited published scientific articles. You think he rejects science? U need to watch his lectures
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PerspicAtheist
No. I think he defines truth in a way that is not evidence-based but on pragmatism for human thriving. I've watched enough of him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The fundamental disagreement between his view of truth & that of evidence-based sceptics well known.I think it matters in fight against PoMo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.