And, instead of addressing your personality flaws, you can imagine yourself saving the world from overpopulation.https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/911666932503449607 …
-
-
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
Out of curiosity, do you consider priests who don't have kids selfish?
4 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
I think he's addressing these specific people, and more broadly the type of person who refers to human beings as a cancer on the planet.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Well, we kind of are? But we don't need to be.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @PerspicAtheist and
Maybe you are. Most people aren't though. Feel free not to breed and instead give your spare resources to someone who does.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealTrumpsFeels @PerspicAtheist and
Most people aren't because they can't afford to be. Those of us who can could be more responsible for the sake of our children's future.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @PerspicAtheist and
So people would be cancer, if only they could, but can't manage? Glad to hear you're opposed to wealth redistribution and poverty reduction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealTrumpsFeels @PerspicAtheist and
OK, you just talk to yourself then. Clearly not going to be any conversation in good faith here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @PerspicAtheist and
You're the one who called people cancer except when they can't afford it. If you want to stop the 'cancer' enriching the poor wouldn't help.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Humanity is acting kind of like a cancer when it threatens to destroy its host but it doesn't need to be like that. My point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.