And, instead of addressing your personality flaws, you can imagine yourself saving the world from overpopulation.https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/911666932503449607 …
-
-
You do realize the things you listed, won't affect the planet in the long run right? Just us and some other species.
-
Yes. It's us and other species I am worried about.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/911899960102277120 …
-
So are the people ranting at me in defence of having children, btw. I assume they want them to survive.
-
TBH, I want out of this conversation. I had no intention of bringing a rant your way. Keep up the good work, Helen. Love ur writing.
-
Sorry, didn't realise you were still here!
-
His somewhat toothed response to your 'we kind of are' comment was probably off putting, but I can't tell you how much I recommend watching
-
His two online lecture series and his book Maps of Meaning. In redibly enlightening (and no I'm not some religious convert now :P ).
-
Atheists in particular need to know what Peterson (and for example John Vervaeke) have to say.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
& your reply "the element doing better" is such a convenient rebuttal, since these people are direct contradictions to your statement.
-
That we are 'kind of' a cancer but can do better? No, I don't think so. I'd not say 'cancer.' I'd say disproportionately destructive
-
Alot of things are disproportionately destructive, cancer is something that ultimately kills it's host. So I don't get the comparison.
-
Then don't make it. I won't. I'll say kind of except that we can do better.
-
Yh, "kind of" isn't an argument. Alot of things (including other species) would then be "kind of" like cancer.
-
No, it wasn't an argument. It was an offhand tweet in part of a conversation that didn't really go anywhere.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.