I have said the sample is small & also that it must be remembered that it went out in a liberal/sceptical circle.
-
-
Its that the radfems just have the one issue whilst the others are all being made by the same people who form a group not much bigger.
-
So, I think I just need to be very clear that 'points of contention' not *people* are represented by the figures & the ppl can hold a mix.
-
Maybe also have a pie chart for the rad fems and another for the liberal/sceptical group.
-
I did consider this but the problem is that the 'broadly liberal' group don't tend to identify their political positions.
-
Someone saying they favour equal opportunities could be left-liberal, centrist, conservative. It'd get even more subjective.
-
I could look at their views & say 'left-leaning liberal' but they could consider themselves a right-wing libertarian.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.