I suspected this could happen since you mentioned quantative data & statistics. So I jumped at it 
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
i.e. avoid extrapolating to the category generally — especially given the limited sample size + how the sample was obtained
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @StephanieLahey @TamaraBrouwer1
Category of people, do you mean? I'm still not following you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @StephanieLahey @HPluckrose
You get it one tweet. In need 8.
I need to work on this. Obviously.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @StephanieLahey
I have said the sample is small & also that it must be remembered that it went out in a liberal/sceptical circle.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Although it was posted on several academic sites, they mostly ignored &the sample is mostly ppl who follow me or Richard Dawkins on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Tho that doesn't explain all the radfems.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @StephanieLahey
Which would make an excellent case for more collection of data/quantative research. Which is good. :)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes, I've referred to it as an 'initial outreach' inspired by all the women who write to me.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.