i.e. avoid extrapolating to the category generally — especially given the limited sample size + how the sample was obtained
-
-
Replying to @StephanieLahey @TamaraBrouwer1
Category of people, do you mean? I'm still not following you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @StephanieLahey @HPluckrose
You get it one tweet. In need 8.
I need to work on this. Obviously.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @StephanieLahey
I have said the sample is small & also that it must be remembered that it went out in a liberal/sceptical circle.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Although it was posted on several academic sites, they mostly ignored &the sample is mostly ppl who follow me or Richard Dawkins on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Tho that doesn't explain all the radfems.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Its preventing the figures from being misleading I'm worried abt rather than overstating wider significance. I have so many disclaimers.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
'This does not represent the whole population or the whole university population. Aimed specifically at women feeling silenced by intersec'
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @StephanieLahey
Yes. I told you qualitative research is a brainbreaker. I remember my own
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yes, thank you, Tamara. I was aware of this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.