i.e. avoid extrapolating to the category generally — especially given the limited sample size + how the sample was obtained
-
-
But right now I am concerned abt making it v clear the fact that more differences in values which relate to liberal values have been cited
-
does not indicate that more of my respondents hold those values. It just indicates that the ones who do mentioned more differences.
-
There's a whole cluster of values around individuality, meritocracy, moderation that women say they can't express safely.
-
On a pie chart, these overwhelm the other big issue -gender scepticism - but it doesn't indicate that many more *respondents* hold former
-
Its that the radfems just have the one issue whilst the others are all being made by the same people who form a group not much bigger.
-
So, I think I just need to be very clear that 'points of contention' not *people* are represented by the figures & the ppl can hold a mix.
-
Maybe also have a pie chart for the rad fems and another for the liberal/sceptical group.
-
I did consider this but the problem is that the 'broadly liberal' group don't tend to identify their political positions.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
when you see disclaimers that look like long form essays, you know it's Helen. can relate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I need to work on this. Obviously.