Oh dear. I am in a statistical mess. Quantitative analysis is not my area of expertise. Stay calm, Helen.
-
Show this thread
-
I am reassuring myself that at least I *know* I am in a statistical mess & where the problem is.
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
The problem is with you people who fall somewhere along the universal/Enlightenment/classical liberal position on social issues.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
You couldn't be like my 2nd biggest group - radfems - & say 'I am this & see this 1 problem' could u? Noooo. U have to be all nuanced & shit
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
So, if my radfems cite 1 point of contention & my liberals an average of 4 & I am measuring how many ppl see a certain issue as a problem...
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
...I'll need to be very clear that this doesn't indicate 4X as many liberals are seeing problems as radfems. Just that they see more of them
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Don't make quantative statements based on qualitative data. Never do that.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1
I do need to say how many of my respondents said specific issues were a point of contention for them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes. That is allowed. But the danger lies in not mentioning "your" radfems, But just radfems. I was in before that could happen
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.