There are facts to be learned about human subjectivity and science is the best method we have to do so.
-
-
Replying to @AtheistStoned @HPluckrose
Sorry, I keep going on about this, but without realism there is no basis for moral arguments...
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
No, but concerned that where objectivity relates to morality you're conflating it with absolutism. Absolutism = fictionalism, not realism.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Theists claim their morality is objective, but it's really just deontological absolutism based on fairytales ie fictionalism.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AtheistStoned
Yes, I know. I'm not one tho so I don't see how this applies to me.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Seems that by forsaking any claim to objective morality we are allowing theists to shape the narrative. Moral relativism also a problem.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AtheistStoned
That's a bad reason tho. We don't know the origins of everything. Shld we pretend too so theist aren't the only ones claiming to?
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I agree we shouldn't pretend to know things, but if one believes there are better or worse answers to moral questions then one is a realist.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.