Not necessarily because ideas don't stay marginalised.
-
-
Replying to @ExotericArlvy
Then we need to marginalise them again. There isn't any other way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Marginalise by ignoring is a fair method for people exhausted by arguing for their right to exist as they are. They aren't wrong to do that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ExotericArlvy
No, of course not. That would actually work better if everyone would do it. We talk abt that in our manifesto.pic.twitter.com/EGQ7ljO51n
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I agree but think I've misunderstood because banning from e.g a disqus forum is easy way to ignore. But you didn't seem in favour of banning
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ExotericArlvy
Well, banning is forcing everyone else to ignore when some people would like to counter the bad ideas. Muting is ignoring.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ExotericArlvy
Private forums must be able to make their own rules, obviously, but that is a separate issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It feels related issue because no such thing as public forum. All owned by pvt businesses really. So no gen public owned online space
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ExotericArlvy
Different ethical questions. Should private businesses be allowed to censor? Are bad ideas best defeated by better ideas?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Sure. Tho. if answer to 2 is yes then answering yes to 1 can have v negative impact on defeating bad ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, I think it can. I would favour forums which did not censor bad ideas so I could get at them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.