And that's when you've won. When you've marginalised an idea so much that no-one even bothers arguing against the few loons supporting it. https://twitter.com/ExotericArlvy/status/910803149572722688 …
-
-
Marginalise by ignoring is a fair method for people exhausted by arguing for their right to exist as they are. They aren't wrong to do that.
-
No, of course not. That would actually work better if everyone would do it. We talk abt that in our manifesto.pic.twitter.com/EGQ7ljO51n
-
I agree but think I've misunderstood because banning from e.g a disqus forum is easy way to ignore. But you didn't seem in favour of banning
-
Well, banning is forcing everyone else to ignore when some people would like to counter the bad ideas. Muting is ignoring.
-
Private forums must be able to make their own rules, obviously, but that is a separate issue.
-
It feels related issue because no such thing as public forum. All owned by pvt businesses really. So no gen public owned online space
-
Different ethical questions. Should private businesses be allowed to censor? Are bad ideas best defeated by better ideas?
-
Sure. Tho. if answer to 2 is yes then answering yes to 1 can have v negative impact on defeating bad ideas.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.