This doesn't sound like him at all. Have you spoken to him?
-
-
Replying to @scarce_sense
I've listened to him like everyone else. He does not deny this attitude. If believing this benefited the people, he'd call it true.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, but with a different definition of 'true.' The disagreement is over terminology not epistemology. Unless I'm missing something...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scarce_sense
The fact that the faulty epistemology keeps getting brought in & laid alongside evidence-based knowledge & respect for it as true demanded.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @scarce_sense
Whether its PoMos arguing that we accept witchcraft alongside medicine or religious ppl that we accept intelligent design beside evolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @scarce_sense
It matters how we define truth & how we try to obtain it. Epistemology matters. Folk wisdom has not served us as well as science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @scarce_sense
See my other threads. Ppl are arguing that finding truth in narratives that aren't literally true is an alternative way of knowing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't think you've quite understood the argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do know what our differences are and have discussed them at length with people inclined to favour Peterson's approach & said why I don't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.