If we differ profoundly on those things that are most important to me, we are in fundamental opposition & likely to argue.
-
-
Yes, but with a different definition of 'true.' The disagreement is over terminology not epistemology. Unless I'm missing something...
-
The fact that the faulty epistemology keeps getting brought in & laid alongside evidence-based knowledge & respect for it as true demanded.
-
Whether its PoMos arguing that we accept witchcraft alongside medicine or religious ppl that we accept intelligent design beside evolution.
-
It matters how we define truth & how we try to obtain it. Epistemology matters. Folk wisdom has not served us as well as science.
-
I don't think anyone is arguing any different.
-
See my other threads. Ppl are arguing that finding truth in narratives that aren't literally true is an alternative way of knowing.
-
I don't think you've quite understood the argument.
-
I think I have. Pls see other threads.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.