Yes, but he thinks the other kind is very important because you can't analyse everything basically. Not waffle, very interesting, Bret good
Yes & you have to set them out clearly & justify them with recourse to data, consequences.
-
-
I think you would agree that you must nest those value judgments in history/evolution as well?
-
I don't know what that means. We can certainly look at history & evolutionary psychology as underlying values we have when we argue for them
-
I think it might mean giving credence to ideas and customs just cos they're there and are regarded as important in case they actually are
-
Yes, that is a problem. That's how we ended up with Christianity for so long & it took 1000 years to get back to science.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.