See, I'm listening & Rogan is setting out the case for truth logically & with clarity & Peterson goes straight into archetypes & narratives.
Throw it out of 'knowledge' and address it as it 'ideas which are meaningful to people.' Try to find out why & address it rationally.
-
-
That's exactly what he is trying to do, minus the throwing it out of knowledge.
-
And that's the problem. It's broken its bounds and is contributing to the problem of post-truth, epistemic relativity & alternative facts
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.