Yes, but he thinks the other kind is very important because you can't analyse everything basically. Not waffle, very interesting, Bret good
-
-
They contribute to the biggest problem PoMo brought us - the undermining of objective knowledge & the drive to search for it via science.
-
It removes the pressure to have your facts straight, present your evidence, test your hypotheses. You can just talk of other ways of knowing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That wasn't my impression from the Rogan, it was more an invocation not to throw out stuff cos it lacks rational justification
-
Throw it out of 'knowledge' and address it as it 'ideas which are meaningful to people.' Try to find out why & address it rationally.
-
That's exactly what he is trying to do, minus the throwing it out of knowledge.
-
And that's the problem. It's broken its bounds and is contributing to the problem of post-truth, epistemic relativity & alternative facts
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.