Does he accept that objective truth is reached by evidence? I'd rather not have any more waffle abt folk wisdom.
-
-
PoMo & Peterson approaches which gloss over this & go into stories & subjective beliefs as the source of wisdom & knowledge are post-truth.
-
They contribute to the biggest problem PoMo brought us - the undermining of objective knowledge & the drive to search for it via science.
-
It removes the pressure to have your facts straight, present your evidence, test your hypotheses. You can just talk of other ways of knowing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed but this other stuff he's referring to would seem to matter too, it's just a question of if you want to call it truth or smth else
-
But calling it truth all over ppl trying to talk about evidence-based knowledge is how he & PoMos undermine respect for objective knowledge
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.