No. He doesn't believe in objective knowledge and truth. He believes in subjective knowledge but judges truth on what makes us survive.pic.twitter.com/NNEt8ItB3t
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
See, I'm listening & Rogan is setting out the case for truth logically & with clarity & Peterson goes straight into archetypes & narratives.
There's nothing wrong with drawing out ideas that are meaningful to humans from narratives, tropes, characters. I'm a lit student.
But it is important to distinguish these from what is known to be true according to evidence & so easy to do that.
eg Sokal & Bricmont criticise the postmodernists on these grounds & Peterson does the same kind of thing.pic.twitter.com/tfJlN6Z0VM
When it would be so easy to just say 'This myth is important & meaningful to this group for these reasons but it's not true.'
It's not just myths though... He's knows you can't get an ought from an is... he wants to know how to find the oughts...
So do we all. I say it should be evidenced-based & worked out according to principles, not archetypes &narratives that are meaningful to ppl
Well you're right that he agrees with pomos on one thing, there are an infinite number of interpretations as to what you ought to do.
Yes & these are best set out by making clear arguments based on consistent ethical principles, facts & consequences.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.