I absolutely agree with this in principle because I despise purism & you just can't get anywhere if you fragment over petty differences.
-
-
I think you'll find he's using a different definition of 'truth.' Metaphor or wisdom as opposed to hard facts.
-
Yes, exactly. A subjective truth. Much like the PoMos. And he prioritises this & brings it into discussion of literal truth. Like Pomos.
-
eg, see Sokal & Bricmont criticising this idea. They're talking abt PoMos but they could just as easily be talking abt Petersonpic.twitter.com/uExswKHPUT
-
This doesn't sound like him at all. Have you spoken to him?
-
I've listened to him like everyone else. He does not deny this attitude. If believing this benefited the people, he'd call it true.
-
Yes, but with a different definition of 'true.' The disagreement is over terminology not epistemology. Unless I'm missing something...
-
The fact that the faulty epistemology keeps getting brought in & laid alongside evidence-based knowledge & respect for it as true demanded.
-
Whether its PoMos arguing that we accept witchcraft alongside medicine or religious ppl that we accept intelligent design beside evolution.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.