Does this also apply when someone say: expressing X has consequences and is damaging/dangerous?
We can tackle this on an individual level but by dismantling the discourse which defines us according to a certain understanding of it.
-
-
The idea that a white individual could hear different discourses around race, involve herself in them, assess them, make own arguments? No.
-
So, ultimately, the disagreement comes down to a different view of human nature and how society works.
-
Yes, exactly. Whether you see individuals engaging with a range of ideas & the best ones winning or systems of power deciding which ones win
-
Of course, there is something in the latter. The views of the majority do become accepted as the norm. But they change.
-
There is resistance to accepting that the zeitgeist changes via the free expression of ideas & new, minority ideas gaining acceptance.
-
You see it when, for eg, ppl insist feminists or the Civil Rights Movement changed society single-handedly by means of activism.
-
They get angry if you suggest they increased discussion but society as a whole changed & that is how the change became the norm.
-
Yes, the debate started much earlier with Wollstonecraft, Bentham, Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.