The changes in literary moral perspectives are what keeps it interesting. Helen makes a good point about retrospectively re-evaluating!
This isn't really affected by what 18th century authors did consciously.
-
-
No. But to claim it as a hypothesis unique to evo psych when literary scholars have known the same thing for longer is a bit wrong.
-
I really don't care enough about this to argue any more abt the difference between evolving abilities & making conscious decisions.
-
I'm simply stating thst lit scholars have known the connections between morality and lit for a long while.
-
Over & over again no matter how many times I assure you that nobody at all denies this & neither is it the point.
-
I think that you both have good points but the message is being missed abit here. Plus if you're interested in a perspective
-
on someone's work, talking by e-mail and having a fuller discussion might be more helpful? because twitter limits how much we can write
-
and I don't know about you guys but that make it hard for me to really define my terms sometimes when discussing research.
-
Yes indeed. Twas late and I think we were misunderstanding each other a little.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.