The most interesting thing to me is the extension of circle of concern.
Yes, but when he talks about reason, he says it requires lots of different ideas working with & against each other, not individual.
-
-
we do build on previous knowledge & need outside checking of premises, as a society we need sense of shared common values for it to work.
-
even here, he's describing, i think. also explains how non liberal shared values can work for a cohesive society with a common identity
-
Yes, I know, but this is a different point.
-
then don't understand the reference to irrationality, unless it's a psy thing, do worry a lot about individual bias in perception & taught
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.