"When TERFS attack, we fight back.' Another case of equating disliked speech with violence & responding w violence? https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=56&v=uL26jtQXSJw …
-
-
The violence was because they didn't like their speech & that is the problem regardless of whether we think they're right to dislike it.
-
That isn't the point I'm trying to make. My point is that they wouldn't have attacked for ANY disliked words. Dislike isn't the root issue
-
I'm not addressing the reason they disliked the views because it doesn't make any difference to whether they should have been violent.
-
So the point here is an ethical judgement? I think I misunderstood your intent, then. My bad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, 'disliked' is a reference to why you thought the people attacked her. I think they saw it as dehumanizing speech.
-
They see it as literally murder but I am not representing their views on the matter.
-
You are, though. You said 'disliked' speech. That's an attempt to represent the views of the dipshits that started throwing punches.
-
Not the specific views. It's part of a general problem with advocating violence against people expressing views we don't like.
-
Eh. I'd throw punches if someone called my mother a whore. That's closer to 'disliked speech' than a view I dislike. I'm the wrong guy to-
-
That is not discussing ideas. It is insulting individuals.
-
Doesn't make it more justified. Also, these people feel insulted when they're told that they're diseased and shouldn't be recognized, no?
-
And the feminists who don't believe in gender can feel insulted by the existence of trans women. Should they all have a punch-up?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.