Not really. In western history, women were often seen as morally & intellectually inferior humans more inclined to sin & in need of control https://twitter.com/Mic1402/status/907877892972888065 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
But they were still seen as people. Men, on the other hand, were seen as at greater risk of the sin of pride & heresy due to arrogance
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
I've always wanted to write about the degree to which Christian theology on gender differences aligns with evolutionary psychology on it.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
more a normal consequence of dimorphism & human control of "seen as weak" than encoding evo principles, same with 19th cent views on race.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gil_Ant @HPluckrose
sorry. Saying that cause i see a lot that parallel in PopEvPsy, as if there's some mystical mechanism for culture to enshrine evo principle
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gil_Ant
I don't know what that means. Culture tends to try to mitigate nature in various ways. Don't know of any that think we shld go with it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
the entire MRA argument is based on that thinking, as is reading of popEvPsy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh yes, but society largely thinks they are twats.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
true, true, not saying sound science does this, but you see it a lot in mainstream publications, (Kanazawa ex London School of Econ for ex)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.