Not really. In western history, women were often seen as morally & intellectually inferior humans more inclined to sin & in need of control https://twitter.com/Mic1402/status/907877892972888065 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
But they were still seen as people. Men, on the other hand, were seen as at greater risk of the sin of pride & heresy due to arrogance
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
I've always wanted to write about the degree to which Christian theology on gender differences aligns with evolutionary psychology on it.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
more a normal consequence of dimorphism & human control of "seen as weak" than encoding evo principles, same with 19th cent views on race.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gil_Ant
Huh? Not sure what you mean. Not suggesting theologians knew abt evolution. Saying they noted same things but for wrong reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
saying that today when ppl make parallels between evPsy & culture or theology, the argument is (or seems to be) those cult/theo features are
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gil_Ant @HPluckrose
the embodiment of evo principles & not an epiphenomenon that just looks like it. it's just a caution on how to argue, not to you to PopEvPsy
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, yes. Observations once attributed to the will of God are now better explained by biology.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.