Not really. In western history, women were often seen as morally & intellectually inferior humans more inclined to sin & in need of control https://twitter.com/Mic1402/status/907877892972888065 …
I don't know what that means. Culture tends to try to mitigate nature in various ways. Don't know of any that think we shld go with it
-
-
we agree. just made side note on parallels drawn, sometimes use wrong arguments, example:
-
"the censure of female sexuality in theology is a form of men to ensure sexual success by limiting other males access."
-
That is an argument about motivations - ideological. But mate-guarding instincts predate primates & finds its way into cultural morality.
-
sure, but stating cause and effect needs analyses of multiple competing explanatory hypothesis, popEvPsy is really bad at that.
-
it's not just motivation, it's a wrong argument about how theology came to be, whats driving it, it's certainly incomplete.
-
I don't know what you mean. I think its clear that we evolved moral emotions & then culture, including religion, rationalised them variously
-
no probm, see latest replies if possible, agree w/ what u are saying. just have a problem with some poor evPsy arguments regrading mechanism
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the entire MRA argument is based on that thinking, as is reading of popEvPsy
-
Oh yes, but society largely thinks they are twats.
-
true, true, not saying sound science does this, but you see it a lot in mainstream publications, (Kanazawa ex London School of Econ for ex)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.