Not really. In western history, women were often seen as morally & intellectually inferior humans more inclined to sin & in need of control https://twitter.com/Mic1402/status/907877892972888065 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
But they were still seen as people. Men, on the other hand, were seen as at greater risk of the sin of pride & heresy due to arrogance
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
I've always wanted to write about the degree to which Christian theology on gender differences aligns with evolutionary psychology on it.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Because Christian ideas of it was based on observation but given a theological explanation - different kinds of sins.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
After centuries of observing the vices of humans, Cx developed into a religion specifically designed to allow to control for them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Zacnaloen @HPluckrose
(although it's clear it failed in some instances as some of the excesses catholicism demonstrate with regards to avarice)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And sexual neuroticism & the horrible ideas of pride.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.