This should be done urgently. https://twitter.com/AustraliaToon1/status/907542642661232641 …
-
-
Not to mention the fact that what they call "tea" is nothing of the sort.
-
Oh god, they couldn't be allowed their own interpretation of tea.
-
Exactly! It just wouldn't work.
-
Look. We just take two people ranting at each other & bring them both a nice cup of tea. See what happens.
-
Ahh, I see now. So the team collecting results can be ambivalent, and possibly not even know the drink supplied, but you supply the tea?
-
Fine, fine. I am fantasising abt a scene in which furious ranting turns to civilised common ground finding &ur ruining it with these details
-
These aren't "details" this is The Scientific Method!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But they have a bias *against* tea.... Can we really find a set of people who have no opinion either way? Is that possible?
-
No, coz it is the tea itself that works. We could measure civility & reasonableness before and after.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160115-tea-vs-coffee-which-drink-is-better-for-you … Includes research (albeit the primary research would need to be verified).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.