I have to say I'm still kind of torn on the whole issue, because it cuts both ways. I think it's absolutely a dick move for the LGBT folks..
It would be relevant if they would get in the way of doing one's job. Is that the case with Barrett?
-
-
"Get in the way"? According to whom? Feinstein has her liberal dogma doesn't she? This gets in her way of deciding wisely...
-
I think you'd have to demonstrate that..
-
If we don't have a broad consensus, like a 51-49 split (where the US is now) one side shoves it down the other's throats.
-
But are the positions on abortion & same sex marriage really equally authoritarian?
-
That would be positions that ppl must have abortions & same sex marriages or they must not.
-
In reality, the positions are that they must not or that they have the right to decide.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Judges interpret the law, not necessarily uphold it, thus the her possible roll on an appeals court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.