.. see what the argument is here?
-
-
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Scripteladora
Well, I can't explain it any more clearly than that.Women can't make someone else bring their fetus to term &care for child by signing paper
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Scripteladora
I don't see how the fact that women don't have magical sci-fi options means men should get zero reproductive rights. It's a non-sequitur.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
..given the nature of human reproduction and the tools we have available, it is clear that the current system of reproductive rights gives..
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
.. women all the rights and at best half of the responsibilities. That doesn't strike me as equitable, or even pragmatically desirable.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Scripteladora
I don't think so. Women have the pregnancy & the labour, most of the childcare & earn nearly as much of the money.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Scripteladora
All of these things apply whether or not the father wants the baby. I don't see the argument here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Scripteladora
Yes but that is the current reality. It doesn't really favour women.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Scripteladora
In terms of having to endure pregnancy, clearly not. In terms of their legal rights, it overwhelmingly does. And I am fine with a degree of
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
.. trying to use the law to level things out, but the current setup is abominably anti-male, and for no discernible reason.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Yes, it is. A man who did not to be a father and who would have aborted had it been in his body, is not equally responsible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.