.. to renounce his paternal responsibilities. EG if the mother makes the choice without the father's agreement, the child should be fully...
Because someone has to pay for the baby. They both have responsibility for bringing it into the world. They don't pay for themselves.
-
-
If neither parent wants the child abortion should be a no-brainer. And effective use of contraceptives next time they get frisky.
-
I'd say that every person that has more than 1 abortion should be forced to use contraceptive implants or more definitive methods of contrac
-
I think using abortion as a form of contraception is vile, but I'm not a fan of state authoritarianism either What if the 1st abortion was..
-
of course there should be different criteria for rape victims and cases of High Risk pregnancies... but still a lot of women do
-
a lot of abortions and then they get health problems as a consequence all financed by tax-payer's money
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree that in a situation where the woman wanted to keep the baby & the man did not, the woman should pay for it.
-
That's what I've been arguing for the past 30 minutes?
-
Yes & I am not disagreeing in principle. I am saying that signing away paternal responsibilities doesn't just apply to that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.