My criticism of postmodernists, Jordan Peterson & Scott Adams is basically the same: they don't value (or in Adams case believe in) a
-
-
Ah, yes, I just realised that.
-
I thought Weinstein made most sense on the Rogan podcast.
-
Ah, we were talking abt the Harris podcast though. I haven't listened to the Rogan/Weinstein/Peterson one.
-
I recommend it, interesting trialogue.
-
I rather like Rogan & Weinstein on a personal level. (I mean, obvs I haven't met them, but they seem likeable). So yes maybe next run.
-
That one's on my list as well.
-
Listening to it now. I think Peterson gets Harris a bit wrong, but that Harris didn’t get the best version of Peterson’s thinking.
-
I hv time for both
@joerogan &@BretWeinstein so we'll see. I might find JP more palatable in their company. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Peterson has a definition of Truth which differs from normal usage, which he claims both encompasses and supersedes that normal definition.
-
Yes. I should have said Peterson doesn't value a normal conception of truth.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Well, I find Peterson intensely irritating but I would not want any actual harm to come to him!
-
And, tbf, he seems to thriving.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.