Reading my mind? You don't seem to have read my essay. It cites Detmer, Sokal & Bricmont & Butler coz I'd not read Hicks at that point.
-
-
Appreciated & accepted. It cld just be that we see the same problems with science-denial, intense sensitivity to language &identity politics
-
That is the basis of my criticism. You will see that Detmer, Sokal & Bricmont & Butler also make these criticisms.
-
They are valuable coz Butler attempts a neutral overview, Detmer looks at it philosophically & S&B scientifically.
-
If Hicks looks at it politically from right (does he?) & if he,like Peterson, regards PoMo as expansion of Marxism (does he?) we won't agree
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In that case, I won't be a fan of him but I am not going to assume that until I fairly assess his argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.