No god involved - it's to do with assuming you are not talking to a machine I think. Am not an expert.
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
In this sense it's more about accounting for moral political debate, post enlightenment.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieldunne @HPluckrose
How do you argue against pomo relativism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm saying it's difficult without some theory like Habermas'.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieldunne
Not really. I read Habermas but mostly on the public sphere, coffee houses and the marketplace of ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
He's hard to read. He has other major areas which are very relevant to current debates.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieldunne
I don't have a problem with people being hard to read. In comparison with the postmodernists, he isn't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
By the way, love your work on
@AreoMagazine - impressive opus.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @AreoMagazine
You must have been glowing after
@sapinker giving you his imprimatur!0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.