But this makes no sense. As soon as you start showing human brains to do things their ancestors' didn't, you're in the realm of science.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Even if I, a non-scientist, showed another non-scientist that humans speak & fish don't, this would still be a scientific demonstration.
Show this thread -
Because we call the activity of showing things to be factually true of biological organisms 'biology.' You can't do this outside it.
Show this thread -
I cld write a poem saying humans differ mentally from their fishy ancestors but this wouldn't verify it coz I cld write 1 saying they don't
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let us pour libations and examine the entrails of a goat. That should shed some light on the subject.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah. That's simple: No they don't. That would be speculating and assuming & fiction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How so? According to which criteria? Those are the questions I'd ask to this person. It's not enough to say "it needs to be confirmed". How?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone thinks they can Magic-away evolutionary psychology? Because we're writing textbooks. Have been for over a decade.
-
They … are antivaxxers
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.