"Sure, the Quran & Muhammad can both be construed to be violent,but so can the Bible, & most of its prophets". Misrepresents the truth IMOpic.twitter.com/K9IcLSmjhq
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But Gurwinder's piece is looking at how Islam is practiced, how people are thinking, what underlies it & how it comes together.
That is what I suggested you addressed. Why you think this means we need telling about the basic problems of Islam, I don't know.
I picked one premise in the first para which I believe is fundamentally wrong. I explained in detail why I believe it is wrong.
No, you didn't. And in fact you can't. The bible & its prophets are violent. You pointed out that Jesus wasn't and no-one disagreed.
Have you actually read the text I sent? Clearly not.
Yes! Because I agreed with it all.
Is it just that you want to talk about those points and nothing else ever? Can't I agree with you abt them & move on?
"The religious example was also lacking, almost all Muslims are peaceful" Not accurate IMO, not even for British Muslimspic.twitter.com/TQZMPleL5k
The point is that if the premises set in the first para are wrong, then the more detailed analysis is unlikely to be accurate.
I give up. If you truly believe that those facts about Islam means the bible & its prophets weren't violent, I can't help you.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.