I debunk all your points in my report.
-
-
That 'Problems with Islam 101' thing is true but doesn't address the issues in G's report that I was drawing your attention to.
-
If you'd rather not think outside very basic criticism of Islam on the level of the text, that's fine. We gave you the chance.
-
Again, this was my tweet. Now why don't you address the actual points in a civilised manner, one by one.? https://twitter.com/jamesbayswater/status/905788990372110336 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Jesus. In what way, is agreeing with them not addressing them?
-
Look, if you don't want to have an open argument by addressing the actual points I've made, that's your choice.
-
What does 'addressing' mean to you. If I said 'Paris is the capital of France' & you said 'Yes, it is' cld I then say u'd not addressed it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've read the piece - twice. But the first para means it is based on some false premises, which I have addressed in writing.
-
No, it isn't. The things you have said does not mean its wrong to say the bible & its prophets are violent.
-
It is bc it is looking for an "explanation" and rejects religion bc the Bible "is just as violent"
-
No, it doesn't. I really can't read & understand things for you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.